Tag Archives: economics

A human and a human and a human is still a human

From within 2017 and 2018 and beyond

In 2017, 2018 and + the world is crazy again. There are so many transformations and shifts and so many proven and reliable conditions are subject to reconfiguration. This is a usual process and it happens at least every 3-5 decades. It is a process of accelerated speed and transitions.

Especially in politics so many people from all political orientations in so many countries are upset, in anger or even beginning to be violent – as if this is the end of the world and there will be no future.

In a way it is funny to observe and watch these developments because it is very clear that there will be a future and that there will be other political developments and that this is (probably) not the end.

Especially radical left-wing and radical right-wing movements behave and communicate as if the world is burning and as if the planet is about to explode. – Well, the planet is quite ok. The recent centuries brought basic riches to so many people all across the globe – regarding economics, health, communications and participation. But finally, there is still so much suffering.

Nevertheless, small steps are steadily taken and the world is becoming better and better bit by bit. It might not be a totally wrong bet to assume that today human rights are applied on a global scale like never ever before.

But still: Many people do not feel belonging – in some cases because of ineffective economical and societal structures and in many cases because of insufficient societal and political management processes.

Today, many governmental strategies are still based on ideological theories that do not relate to the real problems of the real people in real societies. So many people still think that the world is a doll house that can be transformed into a completely new state of being by only thinking of a new world or by only fighting for a new idea.

But yes, the world is old. And humanity is old. It doesn’t change because some radical minds want it to change. Change is a process of time, it is a self-proving process of reliablity and certainty. If one wants to make the world a better place it is probably better to listen to the people and their needs instead of trying to implement fantastical concepts about a potentially glamorous future that have almost no correlations with the real world and the real people.

There might be so much excitement about the future of societies and there is so much neediness regarding change at the moment but things will develop slowly and not every aspect that stands out and appears to be important today will be a part of the life of tomorrow.

Things will change on a steady basis and there are two different ways of fast pace: The one that succeeds and the one that gets lost. To capably deal with the actuality of societies is a great challenge already. Time shows that sudden artificial changes are destabilizing societies in many cases. This is why extremists of any couleur are taken out of the equation on a regular basis: They belong to the category of fast pace that gets lost.

For about 3 million years – since the invention of the acheulean hand axe – we haven’t changed very much. We still live on the same planet, we still use rocks, stones, ores, sand or (lately) rare-earth elements for our housings or technologies. We still reproduce biologically, we’re still having disputes about the most simple matters, we still kill each other in order to achieve something, we still do not know why we are here and alive, we still wander around in almost complete intellectual darkness.

So – what to say about 2017 and beyond? Maybe humanity will  take the next very big step soon – the first big step after the acheulean hand axe. Maybe humanity will develop a self-conscious machine intelligence. Well, this would definitely change things. This would be the first new development in 3 million years. Perhaps this was and is our purpose. Perhaps this was the reason why billions of people were born into this world, walked over this world, gave their energies into the process and were replaced on a consecutive basis:

To accumulate knowledge* and to finally create a new species that is able to go further than us – intellectually and on a long-term basis – without the huge amount of burned ressources that are typical for humans and their silly fights – when even the tiniest steps consume disproportionate amounts of ressources.

– – – – – – – – –

*
Well, maybe in 1848 Marx and Engels were right with their idea about the accumulation of money and ressources and their concept that one part of humanity stands against the other. But of course they were not factually right because even in 1848 there was sufficient scientific, social and anthropological data, that this is not the “final” or most important conflict and that the line of interhuman conflicts is shifting on a daily basis. There was an inappropriate and inhuman treatment of workers but this was a specific effect of this time that they effectively helped to lower, yes, but the mass murder that was following their radical ideas was more than just a “contrary” effect and its destructive ideology is hurting or even killing millions of people until today.

Almost the whole 20th century (communism, fascism, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao and other stuff like this) was an intellectual loss, except from the introduction and establishment of the binary concept of computation and some very inspired ideas from the 1900s to the 1920s.

It’s a pity that we who live in the early years of the 21st century still have to live in and to suffer from the shadows of already lost and disproved ideas of the mostly dark 20th century. It is even worse that these shadows still infect so many people all around the globe with their negative and destructive intellectual poorness.

All in all we’re standing at the threshold of a bright new century. And some of us already managed to step over this threshold. From this point of view it is a better idea to live in areas of the world where the new world is understood as a possibility, instead of living in parts of the world that still try to suck in the old and used air of yesterday. (Such as.., well, you know)

a picture of a nebula – a blue structure in the universe

About Intelligence and work and thinking and communism

Many people live their lifes in an easy and relaxed kind of way. They apply for jobs, they develop usual social patterns and calm down their mind by just and easily shifting any reponsibility to others. They do not care about economics or anthropology or politics in no way.

The majority of people is behaving like this. And, well, this is nice and good because the overall control and mangement of initial processes is left to a chosen few. Karl Marx said that most of the people are permanently subject to a form of abusiveness. The very truth is that most of the people don’t want to be in responsibility. It is a very good indicator of a modern society that people are taken care of. It is also a very good indicator of a modern society that people still step into social responsibility by just ignoring any of those concepts that are trying to take the world down entirely.

Some people tend to claim that anything and everything has to be shared between people. This is a very nice and progressive approach. At the same time it appears to be that many of those people who are demanding a shared world are in no way willing to contribute any of their own energies to a future world that would need their hands or minds or even their interests.

This is why communism doesn’t work. The leaders of any political system are able to abuse the majority of the people in any society, in any configuration of social organisation. Even people working in powerful NGOs sometimes abuse their influence (Many hire professional promoters instead of being present on the streets themselves[!]).

Nonetheless it is that societies need leadership and societal design. That’s why over time we always were experiencing the patterns that we are exposed to. Many people may agree on the hypothesis that responsible leadership is hard to find. Especially when taking into account that probably almost every change that we experience is a change that happens on the basis of evolution.

In regard to developement processes no idea that finally leads to a new technology that changes the world is human-made. Ideas happen to come into being in our brains – not because of a conscious mind but perhaps because of a certain momentarily wiring inside neuronal plexuses. We do not control this certain state of information. It is rather that our brains are an evolutionary created infrastructure that evolves on a basis which is in many ways independent from human influence.

Evolution is extraordinarily influencing our daily routines. We may think that we are so independent because we are human. But finally we are subject to evolutionary motion in any way. No brain can go beyond its own imagination. Any imagination of a brain is subject to evolutionary, Mendelian or interconnected modifications. – Your very opinion can be subject to change or reconfiguration within seconds – your very mind can be subject to reconfiguration on the basis of usual communication at any time.

So: Who are you? Where are you going to? Why would you tend to step into responsibility? These questions still remain to be unanswered.