Unten auf den Straßen fahren Lichter durch die Nacht. Aus allen Richtungen strömen Absichten, die an Lenkrädern und Gashebeln drehen oder auf Elektrohebel drücken. Über allem schwebt eine superlight-Variante von Politik, die kognitiv im Wesentlichen irrelavant ist aber alles und jede/n im click-bait-Sinne massiv überinstrumetalisiert.
Ein abrupter Ampelstopp, rote Rücklichter, die Straßenbahn kreuzt, dann setzt sich alles wieder in Bewegung. Was transportieren Menschen außer sich selbst und ihren Träumen hier über die Straßen? Im weißen Transporter, der von rechts kommt, liegen mehrere hundert Kilogramm vereiste Fischfilets, die einen langen Weg hinter sich haben. Vom Atlantik bis hierher.
Hier zu dieser Kreuzung, die von hoch oben über der Stadt wirkt, als wäre sie eine verblödete Variante unseres gesteuerten Selbst. Zwei Auto warten vor Rot und lassen einen imaginären Verkehr der nicht stattfindet minutenlang vorbeiströmen.
Die Welt unserer Kognition ist begrenzt. Wir haben sie aktuell genau deshalb so gebaut. Wir werden sie weiter so bauen. Wir können nicht aus unserer Haut. Wir überziehen die Welt mit unseren Ideen, so wie Welt sich permanent mit uns überzieht. Aber es geht eigentlich nur um das Beibehalten der zwischenstufigen Wahrheiten, die wir stark umklammern, damit wir uns nicht eingestehen müssen, dass die Welt deutlich schneller und klüger ist als wir selbst.
Alles ist eins, es gibt keinen Unterschied. Das, was wir Unterschied nennen, ist in Wirklichkeit die variable Empfindung von Sein in sich selbst; das Bewegen und Strömen des gemeinsamen Ganzen im wechselwirkenden Totalwiderspruch von uns geistig begrenzten Zwischenindividuen, die immer nur nach einer temporären Zwischenlösung suchen, ohne aufgrund einer nur Minimalmoral- und intelligenzvorprägung in irgendeine Form der Totaleskalation hineingeraten zu wollen.
In the future things will be different to those in the present. Time means reconfiguration. And time means change. A few upset minds in the present don’t cause a future that is designed by those minds. Time and change can eat anger. Todays anger can be eaten up by time and change until its energy level is zero. Anger can be eaten up by the pure existence of presence. Revolution doesn’t necessarily hit or touch future. Revolution can be of no relevance to the future. Especially if it is made of irrelevant ideas and came from uninspired minds.
In the future, future happens. This future will be made of future only and not of past imaginations of the future. Some present ideas will change the future but then – when the future happens – the future will happen. And it will be presenting itself as the future. And people will be inspired and mind-blown in the face of the future. Because the future will definitely be very different from their previous imaginations.
This is the future. And in the future the future will happen. It will be a natural and gentle future for almost anyone because almost everyone will be dead who was thinking of the future a generation before. And this is why we die. Future needs us to die so that it always can establish itself in the young minds of new people. Because it has no time for the old people of today or for the old people of tomorrow. Future is the permanently renewable resource that feeds itself from the very and pure idea of raw existence.
We’re ahead of our time.. But we live in a time that consists of technologies that were described in the novels and arts of the 17th, 18th and early 19th century. And all the world is making a Woohoo about it today. And massive political conflicts are trending.. So sad and stupid.. and sad. And there is no simple switch. One has to stick with this construct woven out of the most primitive matter.. So good that this time will vanish in time as well.
updated in december 2018 and january 2019
Intelligence will develop its future states widely independent from its contemporary expressions of itself. Contemporary expresssions are created by the subjects of intelligence to test-drive certain possibilities. These real-life simulations will not define a global state but only test some parameters under certain circumstances and in specific environments. That’s because we are a result of an intelligent development and intelligent development is only establishing certain results of the simulation model for a certain amount of time (Darwin).
Maybe we are intermediates of the evolutionary development and maybe some of our experiences are transferred to a next generation via our genome. Nevertheless, it seems to be a matter of fact, that all of our social expressions are based on the biological wiring of our brains and that all of the social input we receive is deriving from the content that has been created by people whose brains were mentally wired on a mostly biological basis as well.
There is not such a “cultural” thing of a choice to say “we develop capitalism” or “we develop communism”. We are thrown into certain developments at certain times and these situations have been created by the through-time-wirings of our brains and the interrelated mutual inspiration processes based on communicational exchanges mediated by the sensors of our brains (senses like eyes, ears etc.). At best we can call this process anthropological
, but because the process depends on and derives from processes that started billions of years earlier – with organism such as the paramecium
, plants etc. – we have to call it evolutionary
There is – for example – no fundamental difference between so called “capitalism” and so called “communism”. It’s all the same human desire to materialize one’s mortal existence within a seemingly longer lasting form of matter (stones, buildings, societial human bodies etc.), which is – funnily – just a tiny and temporary extension of one’s existence – all within a just superirrelevantly different form of work organization and ownership concepts. (E.g.: In 2500 years archeologists will find almost no difference between the societies of todays USA or China, but quite the opposite – they will categorize these societies as extremely similar because the differences are only inside the minds but not within the material structure or infrastructure of these societies and all people who could express the differences will then be all dead and gone.)
The only difference is between real democracy and totalitarism. And today it seems that this decision is also not made by humans but hits certain societies almost accidentally as a part of evolutionary simulation concepts. Democracy can also get lost in time. At the same time history proves that totalitarism will also be taken out of the equation as soon as it begins to set the superlimited intelligence of human minds as the final frontier without allowing further usual evolutionary development. Simple.
Development expresses itself through us and we cannot develop ourselves independently from the wiring of our brains. Thus, all of our expressions are based on the certain infrastructure(s) of the brain. We cannot go beyond it. All of our thoughts are limited to the possibilities of expression of our mental cognitive infrastructure.
[So, if another mental/biological infrastructure is possible in the universe – which seems to be very likely – there is a huge space for completely different thoughts, products, societies and ideas.
And although we have access to a huge amount of knowledge, we (unfortunately) don’t use it but very often only listen to the next aggressively shouting political campaign.
Especially in a human era in which the term “fake news” is trending – intelligent minds should think about the fact what “truth” can really and actually be. Maybe there is no truth at all when it comes to our very limited space of perception and cognition. And maybe all of us are subject to a permanent but unknown process of development and reconfiguration. And maybe all of our hate and of our wars only illustrate our limited cognitive abilities. Limited cognitive abilities that exist for a reason: To configure us in a simple and easy way so that we are always busy fighting against each other and do not ask intelligent questions about the general principle of development. Let’s use the right terms here: We’re talking about a general human stupidity. Stupidity is a quality assurance mechanism of evolution to get rid of useless ideas and to make sure that only strong and reliable concepts can develop a layout that can be applied to the next stage.
And now let’s think about the things that are going on in the world in 2018, 2019 or 2020+: Cognitively – and except from technological developments, but definitely in politics – they are mostly on such a low level that an intelligent entity really needs to determine that it is in the wrong time, space, society, etc., etc. etc.. And it doesn’t know what it has done in the other interrelationship or space to deserve being thrown into such a cognitively limited and simple interrelational existence, here on planet earth.
This is because things are subject to heavy transformation right now. And the agora is filled with yelling people of all kind. And the administrative people do not have any ideas of how to create a working future. Let’s hope wars will not fill the empty cognitive spaces like they did over a zillion years. Let’s hope for at least a few intelligent people who are not interested in the usual power play but are aware and able to develop a possible future.
Every single human being is thrown back to his or her single existence at several moments in his or her lifetime. – It can be a simple minded existence that expresses a massive amount of power towards a cognitive mind that transposes the mind to a state in which it is only following his or her perceptive inputs. Inputs that are being transferred into her or his brain.
Simple ideas and concepts such as “You are here, you live here, you have to exist within this very context” can be understood as offensive communications by the intelligent mind. At the same time this input could be of a context that says: “You as a person have to hate this and that. And if you don’t hate this and that I won’t love you anymore.” The input variables are made of many forms, many ideas and many different concepts. Especially in political contexts, a simple minded yelling-behaviour is understood by the intelligent mind as what it is: a low animalistic behaviour automation that lacks every parameter of an intelligent entity.
All of these temporary and aggressive inputs are trying to form a very specific and certain mental state or condition of one’s mind. They are trying to conserve a temporary state of mind. A temporary state of power and authority. Almost every temporary concept of understanding is using similar methods. These methods are of anthropological nature.
Human beings can be influenced, transformed and reconfigured on the basis of their intrinsic perception if they are exposed to a powerful presentation of future. Unfortunately many ideas of the future are based on only insignificant data and social rituals that form a pseudo-reality. This is one reason for the existence of war and war-related-killings: Humans are cognitively blinded by ideologies. One just has to set up two different groups of people and let these two groups perceive certain data over a span of time and then these two groups are ready to kill and hate each other – in many cases: immediately. This is a method that has been used by almost every relevant power in history. The very funny thing about it is: Probably no powerful person in history has ever used this method consciously. Because even powerful people are subject to evolution and evolution is using us to perform its principles. – So, probably Darwin was even more right, than todays scientists think he was.
Just think about the idea of the wheel: And then understand, that we not only do not understand the phenomenon of the wheel but we also do not understand that many thousand years later we’re still using the wheel as the major idea for all of our transport systems. Well, even jet engines still incorporate this principle. And we simply take the idea of the wheel or circle for granted – without understanding why it is even here and why it is what it is and why it is permanently re-shaping our societies. We think a circle is a given principle. But why should a circle be a given principle?
[to be continued]
Perception is transformed into cognition and some cognition can also be transformed into fear, the perception of helplessness and even into a state of societal and social invisibility. Many people in many societies suffer from invisibility. This is a result of evolutionary motion. It is not a result of so called inequality. There are underlying mechanisms in evolution that are not connected to power, education, health or wealth. Evolution is way more complex than many of those mostly simple minded parties or societal groups that develop their primitive cults all across societies are taking into account.
This invisibility has many names, such as depression, loneliness, isolated wealth, poverty, uninspiredness, low connectivity, ideology, hate, useless power and many more. In 2018 we are still using wrong methods to address these issues. Because low intelligence is still in charge all over the planet.
Only a permanently and beautifully intelligent and open mind can assure an independent progress – a progress that is not even touching the temporary low-intelligent nature of simple ideologies because it knows that these structures are already forgotten in the very moment they are being fabricated in. And that there are many methods that allow to societally take people’s thoughts into account without diving into low-intelligent chaos.
But is the existence of such an intelligent (human) entity even possible? The recent 8,000 years of highly developed and civilised human societies give a clear answer: No. Civilisations rise and fall and violence can obviously not be taken out of the equation. Especially, very progressive civilisations are subject to decay – as if a mysterious anthropological spell is hitting such societies when they reach a certain state of development.
One could assume that a few thousand years of progress do not really matter in an evolutionary context. This might be a reason for these destructive forces that reliably reshape civilisations and cultures from time to time in a devastating manner. It seems that a perfectly working, peaceful and equal society is not an evolutionary goal. > Because such a society doesn’t “satisfy” the evolutionary algorithm which is always striving for change and for more after more.
This is a very sad but possible explanation for the terrible chaos that steadily attacks humanity on its way through time. It is not about an evolution that can think for itself like a unique entity. It is about an evolution (a mechanism) that is codified in every living creature on this planet, in every material and even within the physical principles that shape the universe. It is an evolution that we cannot escape because everything we do – as a matter of fact – is
universal and is
what we do in an evolutionary context.
[this article is subject to reconfiguration]